Congratulateon Engagement

unusual. New

Here I present two new packs of cigarettes Chilean unusual of these is that the brand Kent is the first containing 12 cigarettes sold in Chile, the normal production corresponds to 20-packs out there but a from a couple of years of 10 cigarettes, apparently this is marketed as a test for the 3 variants that are only made Kent version 4. The other pack of Lucky Strike brand is also sold in a single, corresponding to a limited edition called Click & Roll and appears containing 11 cigarettes, two packs are hard.

Prolapse Of Womb In Dogs

We LOST! Response to Lord

The most controversial TV series from "Twin Peaks" is about to end his career Cathode and the creators of the invention, Jeffrey Lieber, JJ Abrams and Damon Lindelof, are faced with the arduous and thankless task of resolving all questions and, above all, all the contradictions of history after 5 years inventing the plot on the fly. And make no mistake, with any series the plot is invented on the fly. Obviously there are general guidelines plot but the audience reaction and tastes determine decisively the development of this script and "Lost" is no exception, as much as its creators insist that everything was designed from day one. But the problem is not that they are inventing the story about the march but unfortunately it shows a lot, with many unsolved riddles and contradictions unclear. The creators of the series have been repeated over and over again in this final season will tie the males and will solve all the mysteries of series. And I believe them. Why? Because they will use a formula that has worked to Christianity Pearl for two thousand years of history. And the solution to all the riddles of the island that have no logical explanation is this: "God's ways are inscrutable."

"Lost" became world famous for all the puzzles, riddles and surprises every week bitched to the survivors of a plane crash stranded on a desert island ("empty?" Ja, if more people in central New York at rush hour). From day one the strengths of the series have been some surprising twists and turns, some effects shots continuous dosing information through continuous flashbacks, a pseudo-religious atmosphere rather Manichean drinks primarily from Judeo-Christian mythology and, above all, a dozen cardboard characters rather topical (they can define each one with a sentence) but with much charisma (and some pretty goons / as). And it goes without saying that the series has a hardcore legion of believers who will defend tooth and nail against the infidels who dare to question the divine plan the creators of "Lost." And I, who am I? "A believer or an infidel? Ahem ... well more like a heretic, because although I started thinking (And if you do not believe, pica HERE) at the end of inconsistency and opportunism of the series have come to a end so great that it is no longer believed or the mother who bore her.

Season 1: who knows where

Nobody gave a cent for the series "surviving on a desert island? What is this, the contemporary version of Robinson Crusoe? Word of mouth was what promoted the show and it was usually a friend or family member that you recommended it. You you refused, of course, because the series did not look any good, but eventually someone will let the complete first season ... and saw a stretch, demanding more. The plot and characters you get caught in a simple and effective. Arise many unsolved mysteries as why people appear to him dead, what is that thing that kills people (I thought it was a giant monkey) or who are "others" (super-strong fans, like Ethan, he alone kidnaps Claire and hangs from a pine Charlie) or what makes a boat in the middle of the jungle or what's under the hatch. And these were not questions which the people engaged in the series, but the certainty that behind all the riddles was a "master plan" that would explain everything. Finally, in the series is many minds and many metaphysical homespun and it appears that the island is a magical place that tests anyone who lives there, rewarding the believers and cursing those who are not. We are the first deaths (such as Boone, who carried him partly because he slept with his sister) and a love triangle between Jake pease-Kate-Sawer, one of the biggest attractions of the series: which of the two beds will remain the freckled?

Season 2: Do not play with the gadgets

There are new characters, like Ana Lucia, failed attempt to create a rival for Kate to get the love of Jake Shepard (is funky Jake and Ana Lucia on the plane?). A whole metaphysics of the first season is joined by more scientific explanations, for example, that the island is the cane from Spain in electromagnetism and there are all supernatural characteristics. It is mentioned for the first time to the Dharma initiative and we see some of his videos explaining (namaste). We know more about the "other" (so it seems we are possessed by some "evil" and the thing is contagious) and we even see the statue of a giant foot with four toes. It first appears that Benjamin Linus is to be the leader of the band ("I had originally planned it? So why Russeau tortured him not to tell him where her daughter was?). But the highlight of the season is the key to be entered every 108 minutes on the computer in the hatch because if the world ends! (Because in the end did not introduce the key and the world did not end). Most notable is as removed from the medium to Michael and his son Walter (from one year to another the kid and he was leaving hairs in his mustache), false closing one of the most interesting patterns in the series "Walter had superpowers ?

Season 3: come visit the urbanization of the "other"

More new characters, like Juliet, another competitor Kate's love for Jake. finally discover who they really are "The Others" and what are its members and their motivations (with several contradictions under the arm and several plots unresolved, for example, why put Kate and Sawer to cut stones? What were building an airstrip or what?). Apparently now the others are very civilized with its houses and its amenities and half are not bad people. He even invented a submarine to get out and enter the island at will and have a network of spies throughout the world gathering information (very James Bond is all.) Also tell us what happened to the Dharma Initiative and the final gas. As the theme of the island was no more than yes, they look for external factors to animate the plot, so they invent an international group that wants to find the island and seize it. Jacob first appeared in Uncle Tom's Cabin. The first impression given is that it is the spirit of the island is a prisoner for any reason and need help. Also mushrooming special Dharma stations: Swan, lighthouse, Hydra, etc (great for selling T-shirts with different simbolito, Real Madrid plan). The season ends with a Flashforward, anticipating what would be next season.

Season 4: Back to the Future

Habemus writers strike and this season is shorter than previous ones. The creators of the series, seeing that he will be able to sustain interest for too long, announce that "Lost" will end in the sixth season. As past of the characters we already know by heart, are invented Flashforward, Quico, the story of the protagonists in the future once they have escaped the island. Some characters, like Jack Sheppard, lose their importance in the series and will not lift his head. Other new characters arise, for hache or be, are related to the island (like the guy who can talk to the dead, but then rectified and say you can only see what they thought the dead shortly before his death). Also arise the first time travel, announcing the leitmotif of the fifth season. For the first time we see Jacob and his companion in all its glory, advancing its importance in the future.

Season 5: Let's do the time warp again!! (Or "my time machine is out of batteries)

The beginning of the end. It is evident that there is no master plan behind the story and try to solve some mysteries through time travel (but only is to create more contradictions get difficult or impossible to solve.) Jacob becomes more important (taking it to the island) and the religious-metaphysical is imposed on the plot (and what you rondaré, brown). Apparently Jacob is God, and when I say I do not mean god god like Thor god of thunder, but God, the bearded white churches. And his companion seems to be the devil who is somehow trapped on the island. And apparently the island is also a testing ground where Jacob examines human nature. In this way all things that have no explanation can justify saying, "God's ways are inscrutable" and remain as wide (although this is conjecture, as neither Jacob nor the mystery of his true identity is still unresolved ) (although it appears that is God Almighty). The simplicity of the characters is more evident than ever and give them more complex attempts fail miserably, neither Sawer as head of security convinced the complex as Dharma and Jake is left puppet manipulated by Ben. The season ends with another surprising punch line but the exhaustion of ideas is impossible to hide.

Season 6: God or Devil and do you of who you are?

the last. Have now issued more than half of the episodes and some mysteries have been solved (in a bad way and generating, of course, many contradictions and unanswered questions.) We know what the numbers mean, we know why they are on the island, we know (or think we know) who is Jacob and his companion, even we know what the black smoke. And to top it, there are several groups of "others," Jacob now collects from around the world to come and live in their island (and without crashing the plane or anything). It is clear that have no more stories to tell and the characters do not give more, so the sleeve is removed from an alternate universe plan What if? without rhyme or where we see how they could have been the lives of the protagonists of the series if they had not crashed on the island. The oddest thing about this last season is that the creators of the series know that many fans are pissed at the lack of consistency and that, somehow, we lost the "faith" in it. Well, one of the characters on the island, the immortal Richard, also lost faith in mid-season, being a reflection of the fans we cagamos on the molars of JJ Abrams and company. But the tribute is tricky, because at the end Richard regains the faith (and we also recover "?). And speaking of Richard, has already discovered the mystery of his immortality: Jacob put his hand on the shoulder and said, "and you are immortal." Have you seen how good explanation? Viva theology, art of explaining everything without explaining anything!

The countdown continues and millions of viewers around the world are asking the same question "will be able to solve all the mysteries? In May we will know the answer (although it gives me no ...)

And apparently I'm not the only agnostic place and here I put some videos of you tube posted by Thrutgellmir JamonDelMar and where questions the official doctrine.

Gta Vice City Error Unhandled Exception

Wallenstein (demiurge Fantastic Dimension) on the script infumable of "Avatar"

Summary of the literature: To find out what it is about you first have to read this entry then this one. Thanks. Now, the mess.

Friend James Wallenstein, thank you very much to descend from the heights of the intelligentsia and socialize with the ignorant rabble.

To begin, I wanted to point out one fact: the entry on "Avatar" I have written it just me, and it is a display of ego (something that you know a lot) but rather an act exculpatory, because my colleague Jack and my nephew Marox are not guilty of anything, the impoverishment.

And entering in flour, I'm still waiting for his argument on why the script for "Avatar" is good. As indicated by my colleague Altaic, the mere fact of collecting millions of dollars are due to the quality of the film or the script, but to other factors, like being who knows how many years promoting the film and telling the staff that the special effects are the ultimate in technology and in rice milk.

I think we're a little older ones to have to explain that sometimes the success of a film is not due to its quality and sometimes great movies have been box office flops. You know and I know, so do not put me demagogic with the million, not even you believe it.

His criticism of "Avatar" is an exercise justification of poor pathetic screenplay by Mr. Cameron. For a moment I'll pretend I'm you (god, I'm suddenly swollen) and I have to write a critique of Avatar but the script is flojísimo and special effects are not so bad but, ho, is that I think James Cameron a genius and I will not write a negative review of it. That's it! I work to justify the poverty of the script with arguments like: "once said Guillermo del Toro actually there are 10 great stories to tell and the rest are variations of these stories" or "everything is now counted as the only thing we can hope is to repeat these stories so compelling ... "Does this is an argument or an excuse? If you recognize yourself up "Avatar" left him VERY COOL! Have you committed heresy with James Cameron, for a film that leaves the viewer cold can not raise so many millions!

well enough I argued my negative criticism about "Avatar" in the entry that precedes these comments and I will not repeat. Releasing a big topic tell him that "there is so blind as those who will not see" and you, Mr. Wallenstein, perhaps moved by arrogance, not to do anything to escape from its narrow conception of things. And if you have the guts to say what one thinks, one must also have the guts to admit when you're wrong and you have me totally wrong and the critics of "Avatar." I agree with you that the views is to argue, and that's exactly what we've done, I want to acknowledge you or not.

And that brings you the theme of your blog, I will say that there is something called "layout" which is basically to organize some photos and images for all are not above the entrance, huddled haphazardly, giving the impression they do not deserve despicable his more than two million hits. We also say that the combination of light pink color with black is a blend aesthetically innovative but remains the ass. Another important fact is paradox posed by the fact that his blog has more than two million hits but tickets are very few comments (his last 10 innings have an average of 1.1 comments per entry). And can you believe me when I say I think it's great all visits and all the favorable reviews from critics, publications, etc. (What do you have smoked?). What makes me laugh is his total lack of humility, his arrogance and inflated ego SU. As they say in my village, "you do not have Grandma."

As for the content of your blog ... how podría definirlo...es una mezcla de soberbia mal disimulada, insultos gratuitos a los que no piensan lo mismo que usted, opiniones parciales y subjetivas, fotogramas con tías en pelotas y porno blando-duro a raudales (lo cual es gracioso porque en su crítica de Watchmen puso el grito en el cielo porque al Dr. Manhattan...¡se le veía el pene! ¡por dios santo, qué inmoralidad!) (que, por cierto, en el cómic también se le ve ¿o es que usted leyó una versión para todos los públicos?), por no mencionar esa entrada dedicada a "Avatar X" donde publica fotos porno o ese pedazo de libro que ha escrito you (also published?) with that cover so discretita . I must also say that you're a little obsessed with balls, because they continually appear on your blog, which probably indicates the lack of them. And, of course, you feel an inordinate passion for metaphors and similes: "see Avatar is like going to eat at a buffet" and "Dagon is like a dog shit not to be confused with a pile of earth" or " this is like one who gets to run, never made up in your life and ask him to take a boat and go on a bar situated eight feet ... "or my favorite," It was worse than get laid and you do not run at the end you have to go to the bathroom to finish the job or the eggs will explode in pain "(in his critique of " 2013, Rescue in Los Angeles " ) God like prose has me goosebumps! What a wealth of stylistic! you have every reason in the world to say that my profile and my analytical skills and understanding film is shit compared to yours in life have occurred to me to compare a movie with ejaculation problems! "still in" Directed by "no knees have asked that they write articles for your magazine? (the Maverik I OK, sorry ...) (of course you still published?)

short, Mr. Wallenstein: the only thing that bothered me was his criticism of free and unjustified insult that made the critics of "Avatar." You and your blog I care very little, really.

Say yes, man, that life is better going left to be self-conscious ... MUNDOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BEST BLOG !!!!!

just now, I promise. Mr. Wallenstein: you have an encyclopaedic knowledge of fantasy and terrifying that I admire and envy. It also has (sometimes) a good eye at the time to criticize movies (when not carried away by prejudice, personal likes and dislikes). What are the ways you're lost, you call "quality and personal style," for it, yourself, but please, leave a little bubble of elitism in which is enclosed, that the foul air from view things clearly. Maybe so stop belittling those who think like you and even dare (how daring!) To say so publicly.

How Do I Nuetralize The Acid In My Stomach?

I've finally seen "Avatar" ...

... and will nearly three months since the day it opened, in that distant December 2009. Why the hesitation to time to see this movie? Well I hope you tell it ipso facto. Going back to the beginning of time, the first news of the project I was, like everyone, a jug of years ago, read directly from the "Frames" or "Driven" (now do not remember). The news said that James Cameron had a Biggest titled "Avatar" but could not shoot it because the technology was not advanced enough. Immediately I thought it was a publicity stunt and threw to forget the super-good innovative project Cameron.

And the years passed and the project became reality. The first news of the one I here on the blog of our dear Krust. Having seen the trailer and I formed a very specific view of this film special effects overwhelming and a total lack of plot, or what is the same: the script as a mere excuse for the deployment of innovative special effects super 3 - D. Soon, I read the first view of one of the viewers of "Avatar", exactly here, and that criticism seemed to confirm my theory (and I've been reading Juanlu time to confide in his opinion). Thus I decided not to go to the cinema to see such nonsense, mostly because I did not want to contribute my 9.90 euros to the progressive devaluation of the medium we love so much (and, ultimately, is simply an artistic way to tell a good story.)

And the months passed, I was bombarded by the opinions, not only friendly but extremely enthusiastic of my colleagues and friends: "You have to see it!" "I already have seen it three times and the 160 minutes fly by ! "," score a before and after in the history of cinema! "" You still have not gone to see it?! Are you crazy?! ". To which I always said, "is that the trailer tells you the whole movie and I did not get into the movies to see special effects "to which all responded" Well do not believe that history is not as you think ...", to which I was intrigued and doubt assailed me : I was being a snob, an intellectual gafapastas, a purist immobile? Had she been too hard on my preliminary analysis and should give Cameron a good opportunity? "Fuck", I concluded, "and see the DVD when you purchase any colleague or family" and parked the issue indefinitely.

until this morning. By chance I got into this blog "Fantasy Dimension" of the ineffable James Wallenstein, a man with an ego the size of a movie screen (maybe that's why he likes both the middle) and boasts that his blog is the number one Top 100 of something called "Horror Society" (which I say, if "Dimension fantastic" was the best, how they should be the other 99, but anyway ...), blog that has, in theory, with a legion of fans willing to praise and defend the good of James to the killing (which surely I'm getting in trouble for posting this entry ...). In short, I read the opinion of James Wallenstein on "Avatar" (you The itching can read here ) and was quite scaly, particularly with this paragraph:

"We talked about James Cameron has written a genius. So when many criticize nonsense that the script is worthless, these buds sure you give them a pencil and a sheet of paper and ask them to do an essay on a topic ... and get stuck half hour in the first two "I mean phrases? There is nothing worse than a bunch of illiterate posing as great minds. Do you think all who are able to do or write something better? Please antics for carnivals. "

And I recognize that I piqué and I wanted to answer (Wow, just like old times Linkara!) but of course how to answer if he had seen the movie? Damn! I had no need to go to the movies to see in situ "Avatar" from James Cameron (who knows, maybe the visionary of Wallenstein was right and we were all a "cocoon" and "illiterate" and was actually the Avatar " Citizen Kane "XXI Century).

Well, I just got the film y. .. and I did hurt the soul to pay 9.90 euros to see such a monstrosity. Gloriaaa benditaa, what more bad movie! But do not get insulted Mr. Wallenstein, I will seriously and try to argue my negative opinion about this "movie" (well, quotation marks). Ahem ...

no doubt "Avatar" is one of the worst films of James Cameron (if we understand an artistic film to tell a good story.) His script is bad because it is predictable, simple, full of topical and extremely boring. The only question that has one is to discover whether the main character die at the end, the bride or neither. The argument is a mere excuse for the deployment of special effects (which at 30 minutes just tired). The characters have no charisma or depth whatsoever and the philosophy of the "navi" is taken directly from "Lion King", at an intellectual level near the preschool. For me, the best Cameron is the "Terminator", the "Aliens" and "Abyss" now that's pure genius (and a perfect balance between script and special effects). The rest want to loop the loop and find fame and money through extra-cinematic forms.

Asked whether Mr. Wallenstein think I can write a script better than James Cameron ... God, yeah! And not because I'm a good writer, but because it is impossible to do worse! It is not lack of originality in the argument that bothers me or that are Navi smurf version of the Indians Native Americans (Isaac Asimov did a lot of science fiction stories based on episodes of History (as the fall of the Roman Empire) and all are great), what really bothers me a screenplay by James Cameron is the obvious unwillingness to create a minimally interesting plot and characters give us "truth." Sounds like a joke that James Cameron will not shake the pulse repeat a series of trite clichés as the gender and the environment. And frankly, I think this simple story is an accident or an oversight, by contrast, is calculated and revealed millimetric the true message of the film and the ultimate intention director: "The only thing really important in" Avatar "are the special effects, and everything else is irrelevant.". And no, Mr Cameron, what really matters in a film is the story that counts and staging the service history. The story may be more complex or simple, can be original or be influenced by previous films, but a movie, above all, must be honest with the viewer and the environment, and "Avatar" is completely dishonest to the cinema (and in case) because it encourages the creation of good films made by good directors, actors and screenwriters, but encourages the media balls business and billionaires at the expense of cinema (something which has been taking in Hollywood for 30 years but never so blatantly). Although I must admit that James Cameron has been very frank with the audience, as the few minutes of the trailer shows blatantly the intentions of the director: "Do not worry, fans of mine, the script is silly and mascadito to avoid layoffs and so you fully enjoy the images in 3-D. "

And lest anyone be confused or misunderstand me: I firmly believe that the future of cinema lies in the improvement of technology and the consolidation of the 3D (without glasses and without hosts) but a 3D done with intelligence, subtly and tastefully. The 3-D "Avatar" has reminded me prints of saints, virgins and Jesus Christ that my grandmothers had them do you remember? It was the acme of bad taste, gaudy and tacky, that were moving and the background changed or moved holy hand. The forest of Christmas and the creatures that inhabit it are a mix of colors that do not stick or glue (and lint-jellyfish are the height of tacky and stupid thing.)

Anyway, I do not regret having seen the "movie" (more than anything to be able to answer Wallstein largemouth and similar) but does not recommend it to anyone. 3-D images do not deserve the sovereign 160 minutes of boredom. And if some refer to "Avatar" as a classic of science fiction, it only notes that the term "classic" is very undervalued in these uncertain days.